SDRC@33Anniversary Program Held
Welcome remarks were delivered by SDRC Director Dennis Trinidad, who expressed his hope that the Center would succeed in creating “an enabling environment that will foster collaboration among its research fellows.” He also suggested that the University “consider hiring researchers and research associates who will devote their time to research alone,” a practice currently being done in foreign universities, which would contribute much to fostering a healthy research climate.
The study defines urban resilience as the capability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from significant multi-hazard threats with minimum damage to public safety and health, the economy, and security of a given urban area. In relation to this, Dr. Contreras presented the steps that will be undertaken in the study: the first, problem identification, will be done by analyzing definitions of urban resilience, analyzing definitions/examples of urban resilience interventions, looking into past performance in terms of successes and failures to adopt/enforce urban reliance interventions, and applying the Theory of Change underpinning urban resilience interventions and the use of knowledge in the past. Dr. Javier concluded the symposium with his presentation on the initial findings for the project “Study on the Scholarship and Student Financial Assistance Program in Post-Basic Education in the Philippines.” The study, which has been commissioned by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), together with the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA), seeks to evaluate the current system of granting financial assistance in the Philippines using public funds in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity considerations.
Meanwhile, the qualitative survey was conducted among selected SUCs in NCR, CAR, Regions 3 (Central Luzon), 4A (CALABARZON), 4B (MIMAROPA), 7 (Cebu), and 8 (Samar-Leyte). Included in the sample of interviewees were scholars (past – those who graduated in 2009, 2010, and 2011; and present – those who are currently enrolled), administrators/directors/officers of scholarship programs, and barangay officials (chairman, secretary, kagawad or barangay councilor-in-charge of education). Among the findings obtained by the research team were: scholarship program officers have found that some scholars endorsed or awarded by CHED do not comply with the guidelines, and in other cases there is no transparency as to how scholars are selected. Several scholars enjoy more than one scholarship. CHED also has no formal procedures of disseminating their scholarships and it is only through word of mouth that it is disseminated. The common problem reported by scholars is the delay in receiving the scholarship amount and its problematic every during examination.
The latest publication of the Center, Ma. Elena Chiong-Javier et.al.’s “Holding Their Own: Smallholder Production, Marketing and Women Issues in Philippine Agroforestry,” was launched with special guest Dr. Gelia T. Castillo, Philippine National Scientist and a pioneer in agricultural and rural development, gracing the event. The book contains six pieces whose coverage includes vegetable-agroforestry intervention, the dualistic vegetable supply chain, farm women’s market participation, vermicomposting, and health consequences experienced by women in agriculture in the Philippines. The writing of these pieces stemmed from the SDRC project entitled “Agroforestry and Sustainable Vegetable Production in Southeast Asian Watersheds Project,” which was developed under the The final launching was for the Occasional Papers Series, featuring the works of Dr. Rito V. Baring and Dr. Jeane C. Peracullo. The first paper by Dr. Baring, entitled “Reproductive Health Bill in the Philippines: Sources of Conflict Between the Church and Its Proponents,” describes how the current debate between the Philippine Church and legal proponents on the proposed Responsible Parenthood Bill in congress is anchored on three problematic attitudes and presuppositions that have served to hinder the resolution of the case: the belief in the separation of the Church and State; the attitude towards the family; and the understanding of human sexuality and life. The paper makes use of data taken from historical, doctrinal, and demographic sources and current scholarship on the issues. The paper of Dr. Peracullo, meanwhile, entitled “A Filipino Feminist Perspective on the RH Bill Debates,” argues for the primacy of autonomy and self-determination in framing a perspective on the RH debate, as gleaned through the experience of anguish and shame of Filipinas who must decide on: a) whether to limit the number of children she has, b) how to space the births, c) whether to terminate a pregnancy, or d) whether to use contraception. Flowing from this, a Filipino feminist perspective on the RH debates claims that the mother is a person, a subject entitled to her own autonomy and self-determination. Dr. Peracullo is an Assistant Professor of the Department of Philosophy of the DLSU College of Liberal Arts. Co-editor of the book Feminista: Gender, Class and Race in the Philippines, her research interests lie in Environmental Ethics and Feminist Philosophy.
Closing remarks were rendered by College of Liberal Arts Vice Dean Dr. Feorillo Petronilo Demeterio III. The program was emceed by Behavioral Sciences faculty members and SDRC research associates Alicia Manlagnit and Alvaro Calara. |
![]() |
Links:
Welcome Remarks of Dr. Dennis Trinidad |